I just finished Watching the presentation on Cloud Infrastructure LaunchvSphere Licensing Overview Your Cloud. Intelligent Virtual Infrastructure. Delivered Your Way. PDF Here
I made my own video, but need to slice it, as it is to long for you tube.
My questions are more around per proc cost and higher dense servers.
In the example, I have I will use a blade system. Let’s assume these are two Socket Blades.
If I have eight blades in a chassis, with 256GB per blade . Totaling 2048GB of memory. And today, via vSphere 4.x , I could use this memory.
Now, I could max my memory in this example configuration for 512GB per blade. Totaling 4096. And today, via vSphere 4.x , I could only use half of this memory.
Today, I need 16 Enterprise Plus Licenses, at the VMware store price of Only $4,369.00. Totaling $69,904.
Using the vSphere 5 licensing, if I want to use 2048GB of memory ( now, you could subtract memory required to support HA)
We are talking about 2048 / 48 = 42.66 licenses. Therefore, I will round up. 43 * $4369.00 = $187,867.00 . This is a difference of $117,963 More to use the same memory.
Using the vSphere 5 licensing, if I want to use 4096GB of memory ( now, you could subtract memory required to support HA) And, currently, this is not possible with vSphere 4.
We are talking about 4096 / 48 = 85.333 licenses. Therefore, I will round down.85 * $4369.00 = $371,365.00
Now, in a four socket configuration, you get more CPU, but the cost stay’s the same.
We are talking about a huge price difference, now, I am not saying I agree or disagree, but I think at that cost, it will be hard to move customers into the vSphere 5, market.
And as a VMware vExpert, and VMUG leader, what I don’t want is to see people shy away from VMware and towards a competitive product.
What is everyone thoughts?
Officially, I have no opinion as cost is just cost. but this subject is one that a customer brought to my attention almost as soon as the product launched.