I think that I have settled on Moneywell as my software of choice for Mac money management. Â I really like how this software is setup for an envelope system style of managing your money. Â I also like that it imported my QIF exports, although there is no way for it to preserve transfer transactions between accounts.
I initially had problems and had dimissed Moneywell because I could not connect to my primary bank. Â After perusing the Quicken Financial Life forums (I was a beta tester), I found the issue – I was not using the correct username and password. Â To work with my bank, I needed to provide my member number and PIN to authenticate – not my website username and password. Â Worked that out, and now automatic updates are all set.
After that hurdle was cleared, I found out that already had too many transactions for the trial version. Â So, rather than importing and trying anything else, I decided to see how some of the features work.
First, I looked at the categorizations. Â These were preserved from Microsoft Money perfectly. Â I used the “Loose QIF” export which preserved long category names and transaction titles and Moneywell imported all this information correctly. Â I was also able to see graphs by category and subcategory. Â One thing different from Microsoft Money is that each subcategory is really a category of its own. Â So, as cleanup, I will most likely be combining categories and renaming some.
The category list is excellent when you’re searching for a particular transaction. Â If you knew it was from my remodel project, hit my Household:Remodel category and you’d be looking at just those transactions in the account selected. Â That’s got a leg up on Microsoft Money already.
The other thing Moneywell includes throughout is search. Â And how handy is that for quickly locating a transaction at Lowes or Wal-Mart. Â The one gotcha I found was in my method of import. Â If I left Moneywell setup the account from my bank online, it would create a Starting Balance transaction. Â Once I imported my QIF export from Money, the Starting Balance would throw the totals off – but a quick search, delete and we were back to balanced.
I’m a big fan of the envelope system (Dave Ramsey advocates this system) and Moneywell is based around that system of budgeting.  I really like the way that budgets “Spending Plans” are setup.  That’s a nice, logical system compared to the cumbersome budgets in Microsoft Money – especially the last 3 revisions.  And I know is it essentially the same thing, but a spending plan just sounds better than a budget.   I haven’t completed my budget, but I’ll post about that experience once I tackle that.
In Money, I could never get my budgets to line up and match the reports after I created them. Â I also had this problem with extra income showing up in my budgets that wasn’t there. Â The extra income was from a previous job, yet Microsoft Money kept bringing it over year after year.
Transfer transactions were an expected problem. Â But Moneywell performs better in some respects. Â The virtue of the categories, there is a Transfer category preserved from the Money exports. Â That makes it easy to identify and remedy the transfer transactions. Â The process is two step, however. Â You have to identify the transfer transaction, click on each transaction and assign the transfer account – and then you have to go to that account and merge the duplicates. Â That merge process is a little tedious, but there is merge functionality in the program – I just need to find out how to initiate a merge. Â I have seen it when importing QIF files.
So after my testing, I went ahead and purchased Moneywell – and so far, it feels like Money well spent. Â I still have a number of bank accounts to add and lots of cleanup to do. Â I also haven’t added my mortgages or investment accounts – so no way of knowing how it will do tracking those – something Money did pretty well.
Any of these companies who could write a Money to {insert product} conversion program could have a really great opportunity to pickup new customers, in my opinion. Â But with a small market share, I’m not sure it will happen.